Konate Under Scrutiny as Slot Reflects on Liverpool’s Missed Control Against Burnley
Liverpool’s 1-1 draw with Burnley at Anfield felt like a game that drifted rather than collapsed, yet within that drift lay moments that carried consequence. One of them centred on Ibrahima Konate, whose involvement in Burnley’s equaliser became a focal point for post-match discussion, analysis and reflection. It was not a match defined by chaos or calamity, but by brief lapses in clarity — moments where control slipped just long enough to be punished.
Advertisement
Burnley’s equaliser, finished clinically by Marcus Edwards midway through the second half, arrived after a passage of play that exposed small but costly hesitation in Liverpool’s defensive structure. Konate, moments earlier, had nearly turned the ball into his own net. It was a warning that went unheeded, a flicker of vulnerability that preceded a decisive strike.
Premier League 2025/26 Arsenal v Liverpool Emirates Stadium 08.01.2026 Liverpool manager Arne Slot Premier League 2025/26 Arsenal v Liverpool Emirates Stadium 08.01.2026 Photograph By Marc Aspland The Times PUBLICATIONxINxGERxAUTxSUIxONLY Copyright: xMarcxAsplandx NINTCHDBPICT001050202858
Konate and moments that shift matches
The scrutiny around Konate stems not from a pattern of poor performance, but from the fine margins that define elite football. As Florentino threaded a pass into space, Edwards accelerated into the channel. Konate reacted a fraction too late, unable to close the angle or disrupt the shot. At this level, fractions matter.
Advertisement
Former goalkeeper Shay Given was among those to question the defender’s positioning, noting how the reaction came after the danger had already developed. It was not an error born of recklessness, but of delay — a defender waiting rather than anticipating.
What made the sequence more striking was what came before it. Just minutes earlier, Konate had attempted a clearance from an Edwards cross that flashed dangerously towards his own goal, forcing Alisson into action. Two similar situations, two warnings, and then a goal. Football has a habit of arranging events into patterns after the fact, but even so, the narrative was hard to ignore.
Burnley patience meets Liverpool hesitation
Burnley’s approach under Scott Parker was disciplined and deliberate. They waited for moments when Liverpool tried to play out from the back under pressure, and they capitalised when space appeared between intent and execution. Edwards’ goal was not a fluke; it was the product of timing and belief.
Advertisement
Liverpool, by contrast, dominated possession and territory, but control is not merely about the ball. It is about the ability to sense danger before it becomes visible. In the first half, Florian Wirtz had given Liverpool the lead after Dominik Szoboszlai missed from the spot, yet the game never quite settled into certainty.
Burnley’s equaliser did not feel inevitable until it arrived. That is often the most uncomfortable type of concession: one that comes not from sustained pressure, but from a momentary lapse.
Slot addresses warning signs and decision-making
After the match, Arne Slot was asked whether Liverpool had shown signs of sloppiness before conceding. His response acknowledged the sequence without singling out individuals.
Advertisement
“I think there was one big warning sign when we almost scored an own goal,” Slot said. “That chance, and the goal we conceded, came from similar situations where we wanted to try to bring the ball out from the back and we were caught in possession.”
Slot continued: “Twice that led to a dangerous situation and I think those were the only moments where we struggled. But that was inside five minutes, so it felt like we were having a more difficult spell in the game.”
The Liverpool head coach was careful to frame the issue as collective rather than personal, situating the mistake within a broader tactical context rather than an individual failing.
Slot insists Liverpool balance remains intact
Slot was equally clear that the broader performance still carried positives, particularly in how Liverpool attempted to balance control with directness.
Advertisement
“So, in a similar way we have conceded those two chances,” he said, “but during the whole game I think we did really well in a combination of bringing the ball out from the back and playing a bit more direct.
“But yeah, a great finish from a position which, I think, we had many better positions to score from. But that’s football and we have to accept that.”
The draw extended Liverpool’s unbeaten run to 12 matches in all competitions, though it also underlined a growing pattern of stalemates, with six of those games ending level. For Slot, the challenge is not about urgency, but precision — ensuring moments of dominance do not dissolve into vulnerability.

2 hours ago
1


English (US) ·